|
CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY
STATEMENT SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD
BY
THE TRAVEL BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE
TO THE
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
HEARING ON THE 2004 STATUTORY DEADLINE FOR REQUIRING VISA
WAIVER PROGRAM TRAVELERS TO PRESENT BIOMETRIC PASSPORTS
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 21, 2004
OVERVIEW
The Travel Business Roundtable (TBR) would like to thank
Chairman Sensenbrenner and Ranking Member Conyers for holding
this important hearing, and is pleased to have the opportunity
to submit a statement for the record regarding the Committees
consideration of an extension of the October 26, 2004 statutory
deadline for requiring Visa Waiver Program (VWP) travelers
to present biometric passports upon entry to the United States.
TBR is a CEO-based organization that represents the diverse
U.S. travel and tourism industry, with more than 85 member
corporations, associations and labor groups. The travel and
tourism industry is an engine for economic development and
job creation. Some 17 million Americans are employed in travel
and tourism-related jobs with an annual payroll of $157 billion.
Travel and tourism is the first, second or third largest industry
in 29 states and the District of Columbia. In the last decade,
travel and tourism has emerged as Americas second largest
services export and the third largest retail sales industry.
Our industry is in 50 states, 435 Congressional districts
and every city in the United States.
TBR vigorously supports the efforts of Congress, the Department
of Homeland Security, the State Department and the Bush Administration
to establish and implement laws and regulations that will
protect our borders, our citizens and our visitors. However,
it is vital that the agencies incrementally implementing these
programs consider their collective impact on the traveling
public. Being ever mindful of DHS Secretary Tom Ridges
admonition about the need to create the proper balance between
protecting our homeland and promoting free and open commerce,
TBRs goal is to ensure that the paramount objective
of protecting our nations security is pursued in a manner
that is effective, coherent and does not unnecessarily compromise
our economic vitality.
THE BIOMETRIC PASSPORT REQUIREMENT
The rapidly approaching October 26, 2004 deadline requiring
travelers from Visa Waiver Program countries to present passports
containing biometric identifiers was established in the Enhanced
Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002, and as
a statutory requirement, can only be modified by congressional
action. While TBR strongly supports efforts by Congress and
the Administration to implement this program as an additional
means of strengthening security at our nations borders,
we are concerned that doing so without the necessary technological
resources could compromise that security and cause harm to
the travel and tourism industry, our bilateral relationships
and the nations image around the world.
VWP countries are among our closest allies, and in 2002,
represented 68 percent of all overseas visitors to the U.S.,
spending approximately $38 billion. Without a delay, VWP travelers
will be required to apply for visas, thus increasing FY05
visa applications to almost double the FY03 demand. As a consequence,
these visitors will most likely be subjected to the additional
scrutiny and hassle of the visa process, which has already
experienced heavy backlogs and turned away legitimate travelers.
On January 28, 2004, Assistant Secretary of State for Consular
Affairs Maura Harty testified before the House Select Homeland
Security Subcommittee on Infrastructure and Border Security
that VWP countries were given only 17 months notice to comply
with the biometrics requirement a process that normally
takes years for a nation to research, develop and implement.
Reports from the United Kingdom and Japan, among many other
affected countries, show that they will be unable to technologically
comply with this requirement until late 2005 at the earliest.
Moreover, the few manufacturers that produce the technology
these countries need to fulfill the biometrics requirement
have indicated that they cannot meet the demand in such a
short timeframe, and given the time constraints, would be
unable to vouch for the security of the biometric information
contained in the passports. For these reasons, the travel
and tourism industry feels a great sense of urgency to delay
the deadline. It is noteworthy that even the United States,
which is not required to comply with this requirement, will
not be prepared to issue biometric passports until 2005. This
suggests that we are asking our allies to conform to deadlines
that we ourselves cannot meet.
We are heartened that Administration officials understand
the importance of addressing this issue. In a March 17th letter
that Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge and Secretary of
State Colin Powell sent to Chairman Sensenbrenner, they requested
a two-year extension of the biometrics deadline for VWP citizens.
Secretaries Ridge and Powell voiced their own fears that if
the deadline is not extended, travelers will vote with
their feet and go elsewhere.
TBR shares this concern and believes that it is crucial that
Congress implement the delay in an expeditious manner to ensure
that the affected countries can plan accordingly and so that
potential travelers from those countries have sufficient notice
of what will be expected of them as they make their plans
to travel to the U.S. We hope to work closely with Congress
and the Administration to quickly establish a workable deadline
for VWP countries and an effective means of communicating
the changes to the countries and their citizens.
It is impossible to stress enough how important international
visitors are to the health of our industry as well as the
overall U.S. economy. Every 1 percent drop in international
arrivals to the U.S. accounts for the loss of 172,000 jobs
and $1.2 billion in tax revenue. From 2001 to 2002, international
travelers to the United States dropped from 44.9 million to
41.9 million. International visitor spending in the U.S. over
that time decreased from $71.9 billion to $66.5 billion. And
our travel trade surplus of $26 billion in 1996 plummeted
to $5.5 billion in 2002. This continued downward trend of
international visitor patterns has caused federal, state and
local government travel-related tax receipts to decline from
$95.5 billion in 2001 to $93.2 billion in 2002. Moreover,
U.S. travel and tourism industry payrolls have dwindled from
$160.3 billion in 2001 to $157 billion in 2002, and industry
job growth remained stagnant at 17 million workers. The United
States cannot allow this downward trend to continue.
CONCLUSION
To further quote from the letter to Chairman Sensenbrenner
from Secretaries Powell and Ridge regarding the impracticality
of the upcoming deadline: Clearly we need to address
this problem. We believe there are good reasons to extend
the October 26, 2004 deadline.
A biometric deadline extension
will enable our allies to develop viable programs and resolve
the scientific problems to produce the more secure biometrically
enabled documents that the original legislation mandated.
We could not agree more.
In considering the need for an extension and the necessary
timeline to ensure that VWP countries are able to comply with
the biometric passport requirement, we believe that Congress
and the Administration need to explore a number of important
questions, namely: What have VWP countries told the Committee
about their ability to comply with the requirement? Based
on their responses, is the two-year extension suggested by
Secretaries Powell and Ridge an accurate reflection of the
necessary time involved in achieving a workable standard?
Given that there are a finite number of biometric identifier
manufacturers, and questions have been raised about the durability
and security of the identifiers, will they be able to meet
the worldwide demand with a reliable product? And perhaps
most importantly, how can the United States ensure that VWP
countries and their citizens have the most reliable information
possible about what is required of them, and when?
TBR stands ready to work with Congress, the State Department,
the Department of Homeland Security and other relevant federal
entities to ensure that those who wish to do harm to our nation
are prevented from traveling to the U.S., while those who
seek to visit our country for legitimate reasons are treated
respectfully and are admitted in an efficient manner. We appreciate
the Committees attention to these pressing matters and
offer our assistance in any way.
back to top
ABOUT TBR
| CHAIRMAN'S CORNER |
LEGISLATIVE ACTION CENTER |
NEWSROOM | MEMBERS
|