|
PRESS RELEASE
March 9, 2004
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Debra Kelman Loew
212.794-3577
TRAVEL BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE TAKES LEAD IN CREATING A STRATEGY
ON HOW TO STRIKE A BALANCE BETWEEN HOMELAND SECURITY AND THE
ECONOMY
Group Publishes White Paper, Vows to Work with Bush Administration
The Travel Business Roundtable (TBR) has taken a lead
role within the travel and tourism industry with the release
of a white paper for the Department of Homeland Security that
includes recommendations to fortify Americas borders
while sustaining an industry that contributes to a prospering
U.S. economy.
Entitled, "Homeland
Security and the Travel and Tourism Industry - Finding the
Proper Balance," the document underscores DHS Secretary
Tom Ridges admonition about the need to create the proper
balance between protecting our homeland and promoting free
and open commerce. As such, TBRs goal is to ensure that
protecting our nations security does not compromise
economic vitality.
"Protecting our homeland from terrorist threats is the
primary focus of the government and of the travel and tourism
industry," notes Jonathan Tisch, Chairman of TBR and
Chairman and CEO of Loews Hotels. "However, The Department
of Homeland Security, the State Department, Congress and the
Bush Administration must consider the collective impact of
all the various policies that are being incrementally implemented.
At TBR our goal is to ensure that the paramount objective
of protecting our nations security is pursued in a manner
that is effective and coherent. Together, though, we must
also work to protect the economic vitality of the travel and
tourism industry and, ultimately, the U.S. economy. Hopefully,
this paper will serve as a vehicle for developing sound policies
that will work."
One of the biggest challenges that is affecting the travel
and tourism industry in particular is the competing and sometimes
conflicting homeland security issues. Among them are the Visa
Waiver Program (VWP), visa processing, U.S. Visitor and Immigration
Status Identification Technology (US-VISIT) program, and Computer
Assisted Passenger Pre-Screening Program (CAPPS II).
The seemingly haphazard implementation of these programs,
along with the lack of a coherent outreach strategy to educate
foreign travelers about U.S. travel requirements, is inadvertently
reaffirming the perception of Fortress America,
where foreigners are not welcome to visit the U.S. This image
also presents the corollary threat of reciprocity from these
countries, some of which are the nation's closest allies.
While specific recommendations are outlined in the policy
paper, TBR advocates the need to develop a multi-media public
education campaign in foreign countries in conjunction with
private sector entities and conducted by U.S. embassies and
the U.S. Foreign and Commercial Service to clarify the concerns
of vacationers and business travelers. Without such an effort,
and in the absence of efficient and workable homeland security
policies, American job growth, tax and travel trade surplus
revenues, as well as the image of the U.S. around the world,
could be disastrous.
We believe that it is imperative that homeland security
policy strike the necessary balance that will allow the vibrant
travel and tourism industry to help America continue on the
road to economic recovery, Tisch adds.
The following are highlights from the Paper on the key issues
the industry is most concerned about:
Visa Waiver Program (VWP) The October 26, 2004
deadline requiring travelers from VWP countries to have passports
with biometric identifiers coincides with the extended deadline
for all VWP passports to be machine-readable. A potential
crisis was postponed with the delay of the MRP deadline last
October. However, the new deadline still looms on the horizon.
While TBR supports the implementation of these technologies
for strengthening security at our nations borders, we
are concerned that enforcing such requirements without allowing
sufficient time to meet them could cause harm not only to
our industry but also to our nations image around the
world. Sixty eight percent of all inbound arrivals to the
U.S. come from VWP countries. Failure to delay the biometrics
deadline, or at least increase funding for additional personnel
at our consular offices, could adversely affect bilateral
relationships and our own economy. In addition, the United
States itself does not intend to begin issuing biometric passports
until 2005, which suggests we are asking our allies to conform
to deadlines that we ourselves cannot meet.
Visa Processing æ Delays at consular offices and airports
are beginning to lead international travelers to assume that
cumbersome and intrusive delays are the norm. The U.S. government
has conducted insufficient public relations outreach to the
international traveling public to offset these perceptions,
and the negative views are growing. TBR is concerned that
delays and inefficient interviewing processes have ensued
due to the fact that no increased staffing, federal funding
or overtime hours were authorized to make this process efficient.
US-VISIT The US-VISIT program was officially
launched on January 5, 2004 at 115 airports and 14 seaports.
The system, created by Congress to better track foreign travelers
crossing our borders, requires all visitors entering the U.S.
with a visa to submit biometric identifiers at ports of entry.
The initial phase requires two fingerprint scans and a digital
photograph. According to reports from DHS, US-VISIT has already
uncovered 30 known criminals and is building on its suspected
terrorist watch list. TBR is pleased that no significant delays
at entry ports have been reported. However, it is critical
that all aspects of the system function in accordance with
one another in order to monitor our borders and protect our
homeland effectively. Therefore, it is vital that DHS conduct
a thorough evaluation of the US-VISIT system in its initial
implementation phase to determine where problems might exist,
develop projections of capacity for inclusion of additional
classes of travelers, test concepts for future implementation
phases and set realistic goals to ensure the success of this
endeavor.
CAPPS II Designed to identify potential terrorists
before they board a commercial aircraft, the CAPPS II system
is scheduled to undergo testing as early as this summer. As
a fully functioning system, CAPPS II will require airlines
to provide information to the government on all passengers
traveling through the U.S. Risk assessment technology will
then rank passengers according to their possible threat to
security and assign them to one of three risk categories
acceptable, unknown or unacceptable. A recent report from
the General Accounting Office (GAO) found that TSA is behind
schedule in the initial planning stages. Additionally, questions
about the systems functionality, cost and privacy safeguards
have yet to be answered.
Currently, it seems the execution of CAPPS II will be delayed
while no definitive timeline for testing and implementation
has been established. While means for ensuring security, privacy
and redress are currently being examined, TBR encourages TSA
to develop a definitive plan citing tasks to be achieved,
deadlines to be met and estimated costs. TBR is encouraging
the government to ensure that the system will effectively
secure the airways while not overstepping the bounds of personal
privacy.
In the White Paper, TBR also outlines some additional concerns
regarding the following:
- Transit Without Visa and International-to-International
programs;
- First responder funds for U.S. cities;
- Food security; and
- Airline Missile Defense;
For a complete copy of the White Paper, click
here.
back to top
ABOUT TBR
| CHAIRMAN'S CORNER |
LEGISLATIVE ACTION CENTER |
NEWSROOM | MEMBERS
|